anti-smacking
i heard a very pertinent question this morning. "sue bradford is fighting for her anti-smacking bill, who exactly is she fighting?" i thought it was obvious. 80% of nz's population according to the polls. many of them are parents who do not treat their children abusively. the people who abuse their children would do so regardless of sue's bill. why punish those who do not?
Labels: anti-smacking, bill, sue bradford
sue bradford goes against the grain, again.
sue bradford is afraid she might be assaulted physically. she is pushing her anti-smacking bill through parliament . for some reason, she hasn't figured out that out of the 80% of our country who disagree with her, someone is going to get pissed off. of course it has now happened. when will she get it that people do not enjoy being told how they will live, by a minority? when will she get it that right or wrong, it's our prerogative to choose? when will those "born to lead" arseholes (govt) look to themselves instead of trying to point their fingers at others? now cyfs-watch is having a go at her too!Labels: anti-smacking, bill, cyfs watch nz, govt, sue bradford
